
Field scientists often work in isolated, unsupervised, or otherwise dangerous locations. For instance, I used to work along remote streams with limited access and communication with my institution. These secluded environments can create conditions that exacerbate sexual harassment and bullying, from fellow field scientists or other people encountered in the field. This can lead to unsafe situations, particularly for non-male students and those belonging to marginalized groups. As a striking example of these hostilities, approximately 70% of women scientists have experienced harassment while doing fieldwork and one in four have been assaulted. Scientists at remote field sites can also experience hate symbols, threats of violence, or verbal abuse about a disability from people they encounter.
Even for the best-intending scientists, fieldwork environments can also have often-overlooked hostilities such as when different tasks are assigned to different genders or there is unequal access to important resources such as bathrooms, health care, and religious needs. All of these harmful situations can be perpetuated by the remote and isolated nature of fieldwork campaigns, limited access to institutional support systems, and inexperience identifying and addressing unsafe and unfriendly conditions. Scientists can be at a heightened risk during fieldwork due to their race, disability, gender expression, and religion. These common problems with fieldwork environments can negatively affect the wellbeing of students and their interests in science careers – furthering the lack of inclusiveness and belonging in scientific fields. This is a major problem for the scientific community. (more…)