Since October 7, 2023—when Hamas terrorists attacked Israel—antisemitic incidents on American college campuses have skyrocketed. In a survey conducted shortly after, over 73% of Jewish students reported witnessing or experiencing antisemitism. Much of this was arguably from pro-Palestinian protesters. While many protesters framed their actions as solidarity with Palestinians, Jewish students often faced exclusion, harassment, and threats, such as when they saw graffiti saying things like “Death to Zionists” and hostile demonstrations outside Jewish centers.

This alarming trend raises a troubling question: Are progressive spaces—often champions of marginalized communities—becoming breeding grounds for antisemitic rhetoric?
In my honors thesis, I explored the relationship between political ideology, knowledge about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and antisemitic attitudes among college students. What I found suggests a deeper problem than partisanship alone: lack of knowledge is a stronger predictor of antisemitism than political identity.
Understanding the Issue: Ignorance Is a Key Driver
Using the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, I surveyed 147 college students from a range of universities, asking about their political leanings, historical knowledge, and ability to recognize antisemitic slogans such as “From the River to the Sea” and “Globalize the Intifada.”
The survey results revealed:
-
Students with less knowledge about October 7 and Middle East history were more likely to endorse antisemitic ideas.
-
Progressive students, counter to my hypothesis, were slightly more likely to correctly recognize antisemitic rhetoric than conservative students, though both groups showed concerning gaps in knowledge.
-
Self-identification as progressive or conservative mattered less than basic contextual knowledge of events like October 7.
In other words, ignorance—not ideology—is the critical factor. Students who lacked a strong grasp of history were far more vulnerable to accepting antisemitic narratives embedded in activism slogans.
Key Finding: Awareness of what happened on October 7, 2023, was the strongest predictor of whether a student recognized antisemitic language.
What the Data Showed About Political Identity and Knowledge
To better understand what drives antisemitism awareness, I ran two sets of analyses. Both focused on whether students’ political identities or their actual knowledge of current events were associated with recognizing antisemitic rhetoric.
Across both models, the same patterns emerged:
-
Students with stronger knowledge of recent events, like the October 7 attacks, were far more likely to recognize antisemitic language.
-
Jewish students were also more likely to correctly identify antisemitic rhetoric, likely because of their personal connection to the issues.
-
How progressive or conservative a student said they were had a smaller influence — and in some cases, political self-labels mattered less than how much the student actually knew.
Interestingly, when students were evaluated based on their political beliefs across different social issues (rather than just how they labeled themselves), political identity had no statistical relationship with antisemitism awareness. In other words, knowing the facts was more important than where someone fell on the political spectrum.
These findings highlight a key takeaway:
It’s not political ideology that determines whether students recognize antisemitism — it’s how much they know about history and current events.
The Role of Performative Activism
The data suggest another problem beyond ignorance: performative activism.
Many students adopt the language of progressive movements without fully understanding the historical and political issues at stake. For example, slogans like “From the River to the Sea”—which calls for the destruction of Israel—were not recognized as antisemitic by more than half of survey participants. But they are used at protests, suggesting that people are repeating language they see and hear from other protesters, possibly without knowing the full meaning of what they are saying.
This performative approach allows antisemitic rhetoric to be normalized.
Implications: How Universities Can Respond

If lack of knowledge is the primary driver of antisemitic attitudes, universities must prioritize education over ideological policing.
Recommended actions include:
-
Mandatory seminars for student leaders on the history of antisemitism and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
-
Increased media literacy training to help students critically analyze activist slogans and narratives
-
Inclusive DEI initiatives that recognize Jewish identity and Zionism as integral to conversations about minority rights
Conclusion
Campus antisemitism is not a product of one political ideology. It thrives where there is ignorance, shallow activism, and a failure to understand history. To truly stand for justice, progressive spaces must ensure they do not inadvertently reproduce ancient biases under new banners.
Change begins with education—and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about our own movements
Rachel Applefield is a senior at Indiana University’s O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, majoring in Law and Public Policy with a minor in Social Welfare Advocacy. Her research focuses on the intersection of political ideology, antisemitism, and misinformation in campus environments. Rachel will be attending the Indiana University Maurer School of Law as a JD candidate starting Fall 2025.