• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Sidebar
IU

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington

Menu

ScIUConversations in Science at Indiana University

  • Home
  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
  • Search

Conflating mental illness with the supernatural and occult

Posted on June 22, 2019 by Alexandra Moussa-Tooks

Disclaimer: Spoilers for the film Hereditary present throughout this piece!

I have seen hundreds of horror films; in fact, I even began my graduate school personal statement on the topic. As a shameless horror fan, I am often asked, with perplexed and disgusted looks, “Why?” I am fascinated by the psychological processes —decision making, sensory perception, emotion regulation, acute and chronic stress effects— being tested and explored within these films and the effects of the processes on the viewer — the ability to elicit an emotion such as fear or disgust through a set of quickly flashed images, despite the rational knowledge that you are safe in your home. I think that horror films and how we interpret them is closely tied to humanity’s history with and persistent views on mental health.

Many horror films craft characters that exhibit stereotypes of mental health illness — for example, the Babadook (major depressive disorder/prolonged grief), Donnie Darko (psychosis), The Visit (mental health facility escapees), Identity and Split (dissociative identity disorder). Regardless of accuracy, what does it mean when a film intentionally or unintentionally portrays clinical features? To consider this question, I will unpack a recent film, Hereditary.

There are many elements of this film that strike me, as a clinical psychology student:

  1. Early scenes describe the protagonist’s past relatives as being diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, suggesting a genetic vulnerability for psychopathology. It is even in the title! In fact, heritability of psychosis is estimated to be approximately 75%.
  2. The protagonist’s mother has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, which we see has been at times unmanaged and has caused the film’s protagonist to have a very stressful early life experience.
  3. The protagonist excessively smokes marijuana, which places him at clinical high risk for developing psychosis.
  4. An unexpected and graphic tragedy renders the protagonist responsible for the death of his sister.

All of these risk factors culminate for the protagonist, setting off the remainder of the film, which to me was reminiscent of a first psychotic episode. The protagonist begins experiencing auditory hallucinations related to his traumatic experience, which cause him to question his reality and perceptions. Working with clients with psychosis and hearing their descriptions of their symptoms, this seemed like a very astute interpretation of what such an experience might be like.

Though the interpretation of psychosis seems to shine through – because I, as the interpreter, have biases and/or because the creators have established this uncertainty – the end of the film is resolved in absolute certainty. The family has an extensive generational involvement with Paimon, a demon god. Historically, Paimon is known, among other things, for creating visions and being a representation of art and science, which in itself reflects this tug-of war in mental health history between science, creativity, and mysticism.

Why is this ambiguity between mental illness and the occult so prominent throughout the film?

One reason may be a long cultural history of conflation between these concepts. When we do not yet have the tools to understand something, superstition can prevail. Historical responses to mental illness have included superstitious and ethically questionable treatment. For example, the diagnosis and treatment of hysteria (or the “wandering uterus”), which postulated that various common ailments (e.g., headaches, frailty, fatigue, depressive symptoms, etc.) were the result, in women, of her uterus physically moving throughout the body. “Treatments” focused on keeping the uterus in place and occupied, including the prescription of sex and continual pregnancy to prevent “wandering.”  As you may imagine, misconceptions such as these can have significant implications for policy. The dark history associated with psychology continues to be projected up to today, partially through the loose connections people develop when watching films where mental health is very quickly associated with the supernatural and vice versa.

Instead, films like this provide us with a great opportunity to move forward. It’s easy to identify with the protagonist, to understand how his particular life experiences could lead to certain ways of viewing or coping with the world. And the truth is: mental health concerns can wreak havoc on a family; it can be dark, stressful, confusing, and scary. With understanding can come fear, but also with understanding can come compassion. Mostly, I hope films continue in this direction, to help reconcile the speculation and discrimination in our past and instead set us on a path of understanding and empathy.

Edited by Abby Kimmitt and Katherine VanDenBurgh

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related

Filed under: Current Events, General ScienceTagged history, media, Mental Health, movies, psychology, supernatural

2 Comments

  1. Brian Tooks June 23rd, 2019

    Does research indicate whether viewers of films that so conflate mental illness and mysticism simply suspend skepticism of mysticism, for the purpose of fully experiencing the emotional journey intended by the filmmakers in the same vein that they suspend their rational knowledge that they are in a safe environment when viewing?

    Reply
    • Brian Tooks June 23rd, 2019

      … as opposed to those films effectively promoting actual belief in the supernatural forces and undermining reliance on scientific explanations.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Additional Content

Search ScIU

Categories

Tag cloud

#Education #scicomm animal behavior anthropology archaeology astronomy astrophysics Biology biotechnology Black History Month brain cannabinoids cannabis Chemistry climate change conservation coronavirus COVID–19 Diversity in Science diversity in STEM Ecology environment evolution geology history and philosophy of science infectious disease Interdisciplinary Interview Mental Health methods microbiology neuroscience outreach physics Plants primates psychology Research science communication science education Science Outreach science policy Statistics STEM women in STEM

Subscribe

Receive a weekly email with our new content! We will not share or use your information for any other purposes, and you may opt out at any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Current Contributors

  • Log in
  • SPLAT
  • ScIU Guides

Indiana University

Copyright © 2022 The Trustees of Indiana University | Privacy Notice | Accessibility Help

  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
College of Arts + Sciences

Are you a graduate student at IUB? Would you like to write for ScIU? Email sciucomm@iu.edu


Subscribe

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.