• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Sidebar
IU

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington

Menu

ScIUConversations in Science at Indiana University

  • Home
  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
  • Search

The cycle of life… and death… below your feet

Posted on April 23, 2019 by Adrienne Keller

As an ecosystem ecologist, I study how the cycle of life and death influences forest structure and changes over time. A walk in the woods might illuminate the forest’s dynamism as you observe squirrels tending to their buried acorn caches and listen to woodpeckers feasting on grubs. In contrast, the plant community may appear more static to the average aspiring Thoreau. However, as you traverse the forest floor, the cycle of life and death is working on overdrive right beneath your feet.

As soon as a leaf drops to the forest floor in autumn, soil microbes immediately begin dining on that leaf. The carbon and nutrients within the dead leaf – elements which only a month earlier fueled photosynthesis and plant growth – are now used on the forest floor to fuel microbial growth. Eventually, as the microbes process these nutrients, eating what they can and spitting out what they can’t, the nutrients that originated from the dead leaf will be taken up by plant roots to build new leaves, and the cycle of life will continue.

Photo of a deciduous temperate forest in autumn, with leaves senescing and leaf litter on the forest floor in various stages of decomposition.

The rate at which dead leaves decompose on the forest floor is a key factor influencing nutrient availability in the soil and therefore overall forest structure. We can think about this decomposition rate as the bottleneck in an hourglass timer – the rate of leaf decay influences how quickly nutrients move from dead leaf material to microbes before being made available for plants to take up again.

For decades, scientists have studied how different factors such as climate and the nutrient content of the leaves and soil affect leaf decay rates. We’ve learned two main things from hundreds of such studies: in general, leaves decay faster in warm and wet climates (that’s why we refrigerate our food!), yet characteristics of the leaves themselves (e.g. nutrient content, texture and shape) most strongly influence decay rates, regardless of climate. Most importantly, decay rates vary tremendously across studies – while some leaves almost completely decompose in a matter of weeks, other species of leaves can take years to complete this turn in the cycle of life.

Impressive ecological variation is what fascinates us about the natural world, but this also presents a challenge to ecologists trying to make sense out of such “messiness.”

How can we predict how fast the cycle of life will turn in a forest hosting dozens of tree species or across different forests with distinct dominant tree species? Such predictions are becoming more urgent as climate change induces shifts in the species composition of many forests. We seek to understand how such changes will affect overall forest health.

In the Phillips lab, where I am a PhD student, one way we simplify species-rich forests is by grouping trees based on the type of fungi a tree species’ roots befriend belowground. In most temperate forests, tree species form physical associations with one of two types of fungi: arbuscular or ectomycorrhizal. In a recent study, I synthesized published data from over 200 tree species spanning tropical and temperate forests.

 Leaf litter decay rates of arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal-associated trees across temperate forests are shown in Figure 1a. Arbuscular mycorrhizal tree species, with a sample size of 105 observations, had leaf litter decay rates approximately double that of ectomycorrhizal tree species, with a sample size of 242 observations. In contrast, in Figure 1b, which shows these groups in sub/tropical forests, there was no significant difference in leaf litter decomposition rates between arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal groups (sample sizes of 89 and 18, respectively).
This figure shows the comparison of average leaf litter decomposition rates for arbuscular (AM, yellow) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM, red)-associated tree species in temperate (left two bars) and sub/tropical (right two bars) forests. Error bars depict the standard error of each group, and the numbers within each bar indicate the sample size for each group. The astrix denotes a statistical significant between groups.

I showed that across temperate forests, leaf litter from trees associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decomposes faster, on average, than leaf litter from ectomycorrhizal-associated trees. However, in warmer and wetter tropical forests, this distinction disappears. Leaf litters of both arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal species decompose quickly with no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

We are excited about these results because they can help us predict decomposition rates at broad scales across our changing temperate forests. They also inspire more research towards understanding carbon and nutrient cycling differences in tropical compared to temperate forests. While this work focused solely on leaves, we know plant roots also provide a huge input of carbon and nutrients to the soil. Given that other labs have shown root tissue decomposition patterns vary from those of leaves, my next field research project aims to elucidate how root decomposition of both arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal tree species influences soil nitrogen cycling. Perhaps by the end of my PhD, we’ll understand the cycle of life at least a little better, if not the meaning of it as well!

Edited by Lana Ruck and Taylor Nicholas

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related

Filed under: Cutting-Edge Science at IUTagged Biology, climate change, decomposition, Ecology, forest, Fungi, leaves, microbiology, Plants

2 Comments

  1. Gerry Potter September 11th, 2019

    Fascinating and important work, Adrienne!

    Reply
    • Adrienne Keller September 15th, 2019

      Thanks for reading!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Additional Content

Search ScIU

Categories

Tag cloud

#Education #scicomm animal behavior anthropology astronomy astrophysics Biology biotechnology Black History Month brain cannabinoids Chemistry climate change conservation coronavirus COVID–19 diversity Diversity in Science diversity in STEM Ecology environment evolution geology history and philosophy of science infectious disease Interdisciplinary Interview Mental Health methods microbiology neuroscience outreach physics Plants primates psychology Research science science communication science education Science Outreach science policy Statistics STEM women in STEM

Subscribe

Receive a weekly email with our new content! We will not share or use your information for any other purposes, and you may opt out at any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Current Contributors

  • Log in
  • SPLAT
  • ScIU Guides

Indiana University

Copyright © 2022 The Trustees of Indiana University | Privacy Notice | Accessibility Help

  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
College of Arts + Sciences

Are you a graduate student at IUB? Would you like to write for ScIU? Email sciucomm@iu.edu


Subscribe

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Loading Comments...