• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Sidebar
IU

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington

Menu

ScIUConversations in Science at Indiana University

  • Home
  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
  • Search

If we evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

Posted on September 26, 2017 by Fabio Mendes

When I am on Twitter, every now and then a witty or funny tweet catches my attention. I laugh, and sometimes re-tweet. More often, however, I read tweets that cause anxiety and make me frown at my computer screen with the countenance of a distraught fish. I am talking about tweets like this one (Fig. 1):

A screenshot of a tweet Tim Allen posted on August 16th, 2017. It reads "If we evolved from apes, why are there still apes?"
Figure 1: A tweet by Tim Allen.

Here is what Mr. Allen most likely imagines when he thinks about evolution: At some point in the past, this monkey-like creature with long limbs that you can see at the zoo – what Mr. Allen calls an “ape” – had a baby that looked less “ape-ish” and more “human-ish”. Over many generations, this process culminated in us (Fig. 2). The small-scale equivalent (if you “zoomed in”) would be the linear genealogical chain from grandparent to grandchild.

This figure shows a series of hominoid primates, going from smaller, less bipedal ones on the left to more erect, human-like on the right. The leftmost primate is circled and reads "ape". An arrow at the bottom gives the time scale, with the past on the left and present on the right.
Figure 2: A (terrible) cartoon representing how many people imagine evolution happens. According to the cartoon, evolution is strictly linear, with more “primitive” creatures evolving into “less primitive” ones. Modified from original, CC BY-SA 2.0

Mr. Allen’s question could be a publicity stunt, or maybe he is just a provocateur, but many of the 50,000 “likes” his tweet has at the moment are probably genuine. This gives me cold sweats. Why? Let me use the smaller scale generational parallel to rephrase his tweet, even if I risk jumping the gun on my own argument: “If I am grandfather Allen’s grandson, how come I have Allen cousins?”. This question reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of the natural phenomenon of evolution. For an evolutionary biologist living in the 21st century like me, this is as misguided as asking why people on the other side of the world do not fall into the void of space.

Evolution is not a linear process that starts with more “primitive” looking organisms we can observe today, and ends in mankind (as shown in Fig. 2). Erase this simplistic cartoon from your mind, Mr. Allen. Instead, look intently at figure 3. Biologists have given diagrams like this a fancy name: cladogram. Unlike figure 2, a cladogram captures the most important (and ongoing!) aspect of the evolutionary process: “branching,” or what biologists refer to as cladogenesis. Cladogenetic events are the moments in time during which one species “splits” into two species – these events are also known as speciation events. In figure 3, these events are represented by the points at which one line “bifurcates” into two lines.

This figure shows a diagram comprised of lines that sequentially bifurcate, resembling the stick-figure of a tree. One of the bifurcations is circled and labeled "A speciation event". At the tip of each line, to the right of the diagram, there is an animal silhouette followed by a corresponding name. The names read bonobo, chimpanzee, human, gorilla, orangutan and gibbon. An arrow at the bottom gives the time scale, with the past on the left and present on the right.
Figure 3: A diagram (also known as cladogram) that accurately depicts evolution. Two or more species originate from ancestral species due to speciation (or cladogenetic) events – when a line splits into two. By starting at the present and going backwards in time, it is clear that any one species finds a common ancestor with any other species at some point in the past. This means all species share some ancestor, and consequently are always related; this powerful idea is referred to as common descent, and was proposed by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace. Modified from original, CC0 (public domain).

The branching nature of cladogenesis has two important consequences. First, because two or more new species always originate from an ancestor species (and this process has been occurring since the origin of life), any two species we observe in the present are related. The truth might hurt, but yes, humans and chimpanzees are (distant) relatives. And so are blue whales, white sharks, sequoia trees, mushrooms, flies, earthworms, bacteria, etc. They are all relatives of yours.

This idea of universal relatedness, also known as common descent, was proposed by none other than Charles Darwin himself in On the origin of species [1], but also by the often neglected Alfred Russell Wallace [2]. Common descent is arguably the most important, overwhelmingly accepted idea in biology.

The second consequence is that when biological classification is performed, cladogenesis leads to a natural hierarchy of groups, in which one can be nested into another. Sometimes one look is worth a thousand words, so take a peek at figure 4. These primate species have many characteristics that allow us to classify them into successively more inclusive groups. Hominidae consists of all humans, chimpanzees and bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans. If we add gibbons to the mix, we now have the Hominoidea (or “apes”). Finally, if we include old world (e.g., a macaque) and new world (e.g., a marmoset) monkeys, we get the Anthropoidea (or “simians”). Hominids are nested inside the hominoids, which in turn are nested inside the anthropoids. And the more deeply nested a group is, the more alike its species will tend to be.

For the most part, today’s biological classification observes the rules of cladistics, a framework for studying biodiversity proposed by German entomologist Willi Hennig [3]. Cladistics is a big subject, but we can focus on its main tenet: The only biological classifications that make evolutionary sense are those nested groups (such as those highlighted in Fig. 4) which include an ancestor and all its descendants. These nested groups are called clades.

Think about clades as being incredibly large and old “families” that include a great-great-great-great-(many, many blog pages after)-great-grandfather/mother and all its gazillion descendants into the present. The “apes” (also known as Hominoidea, as defined above), are a clade to which we humans belong, together with bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons. We are apes ourselves.

This figure shows a diagram comprised of lines that sequentially bifurcate, resembling the stick-figure of a tree. It is the same diagram shown in figure 3, but with two additional lines. At the tip of each line, to the right of the diagram, there is an animal silhouette followed by a corresponding name. The names read bonobo, chimpanzee, human, gorilla, orangutan, gibbon macaque and marmoset. A blue line circles the first five names and their lines, and is labeled "Hominidae". This circle is nested within a larger orange circle that includes gibbon, and reads "Hominoidea or apes". This orange circle is in turn nested within a larger pink circle that includes macaque and marmoset, and reads "Anthropoidea or simians".
Figure 4: A cladogram with eight primate species. The different colored lines highlight nested groups – clades – of species. Clades include an ancestor species (which lived at the point where a line splits into two) and all its descendants. Hominidae is nested inside Hominoidea, which is in turn nested inside Anthropoidea. Biologists arrive at these groups by comparing species with respect to many of their characteristics, including at the DNA and protein level. Note that a human is as much of a simian as a macaque is, and an orangutan is as much of a hominid as a human is, but that a macaque is not a hominid.

We now have everything we need to answer Mr. Allen’s question. If you have just skimmed the rest of the post, here is the take-home message.

We did not evolve from a modern, living ape, like a chimpanzee. We evolved and descended from the common ancestor of apes, which lived and died in the distant past. This means that we are related to other apes and that we are apes ourselves. And alongside us, the other living ape species have also evolved from that same common ancestor, and exist today in the wild and zoos.

Being able to observe ape species other than us humans in the present moment poses no problem to evolution whatsoever — if anything, observing and learning about them can teach us more about ourselves!

References
[1] Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.
[2] Darwin, C. R., Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 3(9), 45–62.
[3] Hennig, Willi (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press.

Edited by Lana Ruck and Liz Rosdeitcher.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related

Filed under: Current Events, Scientific Methods and TechniquesTagged anthropology, apes, Biology, cladogram, evolution

Additional Content

Search ScIU

Categories

Tag cloud

#Education #scicomm animal behavior anthropology astronomy astrophysics Biology biotechnology Black History Month brain cannabinoids Chemistry climate change conservation coronavirus COVID–19 diversity Diversity in Science diversity in STEM Ecology environment evolution geology history and philosophy of science infectious disease Interdisciplinary Interview Mental Health methods microbiology neuroscience outreach physics Plants primates psychology Research science science communication science education Science Outreach science policy Statistics STEM women in STEM

Subscribe

Receive a weekly email with our new content! We will not share or use your information for any other purposes, and you may opt out at any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Current Contributors

  • Log in
  • SPLAT
  • ScIU Guides

Indiana University

Copyright © 2022 The Trustees of Indiana University | Privacy Notice | Accessibility Help

  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
College of Arts + Sciences

Are you a graduate student at IUB? Would you like to write for ScIU? Email sciucomm@iu.edu


Subscribe

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Loading Comments...