• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Sidebar
IU

Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Bloomington IU Bloomington

Menu

ScIUConversations in Science at Indiana University

  • Home
  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
  • Search

The need of our times: Support for fundamental science research

Posted on March 14, 2017 by Karna Desai

If you are an undergraduate student, you probably share some attributes with other readers of this blog. You are likely a millennial, meaning that you may not remember the fall of the Berlin wall, and to you, the space race is a distant past.

Federal funding for “fundamental” or “basic” science research was at the all-time high in the 1960’s (see Figure 1), but it has declined since then. The stagnation of funding in recent years is alarming, because the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workforce is forecast to hit a new peak. Consumers love 21st-century technologies, like smartphones and smart TVs, but what will 22nd-century technology look like with diminished federal funding? Because we regularly hear about budget cuts, we fail to recognize that science funding in the U.S. is not keeping up with that of other countries (see Figure 2). 

Graphic comparing federal funding shares and dollar amounts for science research and development (y-axis) by fiscal year, from 1960 to 2014 (x-axis).
Figure 1: Federal research and development (R&D) spending peaked in 1965, but has been decreasing since then. Though the total amount of federal spending (total outlays in federal budget) has increased dramatically, R&D spending has maintained a level below 5% for the majority of the last two decades. [click to enlarge]
Being an astronomy student, I will draw an example from my own field. Research in space exploration in the mid 20th century was essentially bipolar, largely governed by the U.S. and U.S.S.R., but is now multipolar. Moreover, research in astronomical sciences is seeing many countries as emerging powers. Many new observatories involve international partnerships. For example, one of NASA’s most famous space telescopes, Hubble, has international partners, as does the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The U.S. has managed to maintain its premier status in astronomy research, but the U.S. will fall behind if the scientists behind these advancements do not have sufficient funding to keep up with their international peers.
Graph comparing science funding growth between countries between 1980 and 2013, showing a slower growth rate for the U.S. than for other countries in Asia and Europe.
Figure 2: China’s pace of growth has surpassed that of the U.S. since 2001. If this pattern continues, China will soon surpass the U.S. by providing more funding for research and development, and the U.S. will fall behind. [click to enlarge]

Few people doubt that investing in science is a good idea. But, as evidenced by the trends in funding over recent years (see Figure 3), businesses have surpassed the federal government in providing research funding. The system underlying federal funding of science research needs a revamp. Losses accumulated over decades can have long-lasting ripple effects on scientific progress and our communities. Students tend to stay away from fields in which job prospects are low and, unfortunately, some STEM fields may join that category. When the lackluster approach to research funding is accompanied by a lag in technological and entrepreneurial progress, both the economy and the national mood become adversely affected.

Graph comparing funding sources from 1953 to 2013, which shows that science was primarily funded with federal government support before he 1980s, but is now mostly funded by non-government business and other sources.
Figure 3: For the past 36 years, businesses have provided the majority of research and development funding, meaning that scientists must rely more heavily on large companies, and not the federal government, for funding. [click to enlarge]

In addition to producing revolutionary technology, basic science funding supports communities and education. The National Science Foundation (NSF) is one of the largest sources of research funding, and any researchers whom the NSF supports must allocate some of their funds they receive for ‘broader impact’ initiatives for the betterment of society. These funds are used to promote more inclusive participation, establish national and international partnerships, and train K-12 math and science teachers. Thus, NSF-supported research helps in creating a more scientifically literate society. Moreover, igniting K-12 students’ interests in STEM disciplines will encourage students to pursue careers in STEM fields at a critical time for technological advancement.

Besides helping the ailing economy and the education system, federal funding in science research can benefit international relations. International contacts among scientists increased many-fold when World War II and its preceding events brought an influx of scientists from Europe to the United States, including Albert Einstein. Basic science research projects have welcomed scientists from all parts of the world to the U.S. The Apollo–Soyuz Test Project was an unprecedented example of cooperation during the Cold War. This joint scientific venture forged a path for many future projects, helping to ease the tension between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. There will undoubtedly be many more instances in which scientific collaborations will be beneficial or necessary for global cooperation, and we should aim to be prepared and supportive of these cases.

Investment in fundamental science research is the foundation of many modern technological advances, including satellites, communication technologies, and GPS. It fuels technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and research in applied sciences. It improves scientific literacy in our communities, and bolsters the economy by creating more jobs. In contrast, declines in research funding stunt technological advancement, dampen entrepreneurial opportunities, and reduce the number of jobs available in related fields. While technological growth occurs rapidly in other countries, a nation without ample funding for science research will fall behind.

Edited by Rachel Skipper and Benjamin E. Draper.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related

Filed under: Current Events, Cutting-Edge Science at IUTagged astronomy, federal funding, public policy, science advocacy, science policy, STEM

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Additional Content

Search ScIU

Categories

Tag cloud

#Education #scicomm animal behavior anthropology archaeology astronomy astrophysics Biology biotechnology Black History Month brain cannabinoids cannabis Chemistry climate change conservation coronavirus COVID–19 Diversity in Science diversity in STEM Ecology environment evolution geology history and philosophy of science infectious disease Interdisciplinary Interview Mental Health methods microbiology neuroscience outreach physics Plants primates psychology Research science communication science education Science Outreach science policy Statistics STEM women in STEM

Subscribe

Receive a weekly email with our new content! We will not share or use your information for any other purposes, and you may opt out at any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Current Contributors

  • Log in
  • SPLAT
  • ScIU Guides

Indiana University

Copyright © 2022 The Trustees of Indiana University | Privacy Notice | Accessibility Help

  • Home
  • About ScIU
  • Write with Us!
  • Contact ScIU
  • The Writers and Editors of ScIU
  • ScIU in the Classroom
  • Annual Science Communication Symposium
College of Arts + Sciences

Are you a graduate student at IUB? Would you like to write for ScIU? Email sciucomm@iu.edu


Subscribe

Subscribe By Email

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Loading Comments...